Hello World!

Well… I’m going to use this blog to post my articles and comments scattered in all types of mass media, so it’ll serve as a sort of an archive for everything I publish. Follow and comment on what you find useful, if you wish. All content is provided ‘all rites reversed’, i.e., you can freely use everything here without asking for a permission but please do me a favour by mentioning the original author…

Blessings,
Fyodor

Friday, 25 May 2012

Once Saved, Always Saved: “Legal” vs “Organic” Approaches to Salvation

First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/125-oncesaved

This is the second article in the series of articles scrutinising the Protestant beliefs from the point of view of an Orthodox Christian. I have already mentioned that my goal is not todefeat and scatter enemies of the only true faithbut to find loving and thoughtful friends among those of my readers who are non-Orthodox and to share our views on the most serious and complicated issues of Christian faith and practice.



Every civilisation in the human history has its unique features and achievements: the Greeks, for instance, are known worldwide for their love of philosophy and sophisticated logics, whereas Africans have introduced the concept of ubuntu and harambeei. If someone asks where the uniqueness of Rome is, the answer will definitely be Law and Order.

Friday, 18 May 2012

Church vs. Churches: What Orthodox think about the Church


First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/121-solascriptura-3

Built upon the foundation of
the apostles and prophets,
Jesus Christ himself being
the chief corner stone
Ephesians 2:20

This is going to be my final article in the Answering Protestants series, unless, of course, you ask for more :) Here we are to concentrate mainly on the concept of the Church in general, as it is seen by the Orthodox in contrast with the Protestants. Whereas I am pretty well aware that there are strikingly different views on many aspects of Christian faith and practice among the Protestants (i.e., communities, each of which claims to base their faith only on the Bible), ecclesiology (= teaching on Church) is very similar in most Protestant denominations (with the rare exception of the Anglican community) because they all have to do something in order to explain the evident fact that there are so many blends and types of Christianity, contrary to the words of our Saviour they read in the Gospel, “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.” So we as Christians are called to represent the Holy Trinity in our unity and joint witness to the world but unfortunately we fail to live up to the ideal of unity we read of in the Scripture due to human infirmities and sins, the greatest of which is pride. Hence we have two options: either we stop divisions and are re-unite in the faith of the Apostles and Fathers or we make attempts to justify ourselves. Sad though it is to say, the mainstream Protestant theology has chosen the second route.

Friday, 11 May 2012

Eating His Flesh and Drinking His Blood – Sounds Tough, Doesn't It?

First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/114-solascriptura-2

Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
John 6:53-58 (KJV)

This is the third article of the series devoted to answering Protestants from the point of view of an Orthodox Christian. I hope we will be able to draw a quick sketch of a very complex Orthodox doctrine – the reality of the Eucharist and the theological implications it has for faith and practice. Without looking at this very important point, it is virtually impossible to get through to the point of the unity of the visible Church we've been talking about for so long already.


Friday, 4 May 2012

What's Wrong with the Sola Scriptura?

First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/96-solascriptura

I was asked by a friend of mine to write an article on the controversial Protestant doctrine of the “Invisible Church” some time ago. I must admit that this turned out to be an immensely difficult task for me because the topic is so broad and embraces so many sub-topics that it is really worth a book of a thousand pages [1]. That was why I decided to devote a series of articles, rather than just a single article, to cover all those sub-topics. The article you are reading right now is the first of this series, and it deals with one of the main pillars of the Protestant beliefs – the Sola Scriptura doctrine - utilising scientific method and common sense. In the forthcoming weeks, I plan to write more articles of the series, which will include:
  1. Differences in the Protestant and the Orthodox understanding of salvation. “Once Saved, Always Saved "?
  2. Theological implications of the reality of the Eucharist. “Eating His Flesh and Drinking His Blood – Sounds Tough, Isn't It?”
  3. and finally, Structure and Management of the Church. “Unity in Diversity or Diversity without Unity?”
Hopefully, all these articles will serve to outline the major differences of Protestant versus Orthodox views and give a start for a friendly and thoughtful exchange of opinions.


Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Light from the East: Is There A Different Solution for Traditional Anglicans?

When I read the news about traditional Anglicans who become more and more disillusioned with the liberal direction that the Anglican Communion has chosen in the recent decades and thus decide to become Catholic converts and about the plans of the Roman curia to accommodate them within a special Ordinariate, I have dual feelings: on the one hand, I'm happy that there are so many Christians who genuinely wish to follow the Biblical teaching on morality and ecclesiastic issues and remain unscathed in the face of aggressive secularism; but on the other hand, I cannot approve of the way they have chosen, bearing in mind the history of Orthodox-Anglican dialogue in the past centuries and the perspectives it has opened for both parties.

Hopefully, this article will find an answer in the hearts of both the Orthodox and the members of the Anglican community who are considering their next steps. It wasn't my aim to write another polemical anti-Catholic pamphlet (there are already tons of them in circulation nowadays) – and I will be really sorry if anyone considers this article to be one.