Just FYI: A very very authoritative and historic document (signed by four Patriarchs). Gives clear and accurate answers to the Roman Catholic (personally, I prefer to refer to this denominations as 'Latins', for they are neither truly 'Roman' (Rome ceased to be the capital of the Empire in AD 476), nor 'Catholic' ('all-embracing', 'universal') doctrines of papal primacy, infallibility, dogmatic development and filioque. Also deals with the issue of authority in the Church:
Encyclical of the Eastern Patriarchs, 1848
Hello World!
Well… I’m going to use this blog to post my articles and comments scattered in all types of mass media, so it’ll serve as a sort of an archive for everything I publish. Follow and comment on what you find useful, if you wish. All content is provided ‘all rites reversed’, i.e., you can freely use everything here without asking for a permission but please do me a favour by mentioning the original author…
Blessings,
Fyodor
Blessings,
Fyodor
Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts
Thursday, 13 September 2012
Wednesday, 27 June 2012
What's in a Name?
Why do Catholics call themselves Catholic and Orthodox call themselves Orthodox? Have you ever wondered about it?
For Catholics, the most important characteristic of their faith is its 'catholicity' (read: universalism, embracing everybody everywhere). Hence comes power grabbing, Crusades, proselytism, secularism, modernism, etc. For the Orthodox, the most important characteristic of their faith is its 'Orthodoxy' (unbroken continuity of doctrine from the times of Apostles and Christ Himself). Thus, the Orthodox aren't afraid to remain alone (cf. "Fear ye not, small flock", "Athanasius Contra Mundum"...) as far as they preserve "the faith once given to the saints".
Do you agree?
NB: This is not to reject the belief in the "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" but to emphasise the fact that the Church cannot be 'Catholic' without remaining 'Orthodox'.
For Catholics, the most important characteristic of their faith is its 'catholicity' (read: universalism, embracing everybody everywhere). Hence comes power grabbing, Crusades, proselytism, secularism, modernism, etc. For the Orthodox, the most important characteristic of their faith is its 'Orthodoxy' (unbroken continuity of doctrine from the times of Apostles and Christ Himself). Thus, the Orthodox aren't afraid to remain alone (cf. "Fear ye not, small flock", "Athanasius Contra Mundum"...) as far as they preserve "the faith once given to the saints".
Do you agree?
NB: This is not to reject the belief in the "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" but to emphasise the fact that the Church cannot be 'Catholic' without remaining 'Orthodox'.
Friday, 8 June 2012
Primus inter Pares
First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/133-primusinterpares
What's Wrong With Apostolic Succession?
What's Wrong With Apostolic Succession?
One
of the main arguments in favour of the Catholic Church (and the
Orthodox Church) vs. the multitude of Protestant denominations has
recently been their inherent Apostolic succession. The Protestants,
seeing that they cannot beat those old traditional churches in this
field, tend to reject the importance of Apostolic succession – and the
very concept in general. And they're right – in the way they see it.
Let's see what the concept of Apostolic succession teaches.
Friday, 25 May 2012
Once Saved, Always Saved: “Legal” vs “Organic” Approaches to Salvation
First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/125-oncesaved
This
is the
second article
in the
series of
articles
scrutinising the
Protestant
beliefs from
the point
of view
of an
Orthodox
Christian. I
have already
mentioned that
my goal
is not
to “defeat
and scatter
enemies of
the only
true faith”
but to
find loving
and thoughtful
friends among
those of
my readers
who are
non-Orthodox and
to share
our views
on the
most serious
and complicated
issues of
Christian faith
and practice.
Every
civilisation in
the human
history has
its unique
features and
achievements: the
Greeks, for
instance, are
known worldwide
for their
love of
philosophy and
sophisticated
logics, whereas
Africans have
introduced the
concept of
ubuntu and
harambeei.
If someone
asks where
the uniqueness
of Rome
is, the
answer will
definitely be
Law and
Order.
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
Light from the East: Is There A Different Solution for Traditional Anglicans?
First published @ http://radio-awakening.com/index.php/73-light-from-the-east-orthodoxy-for-traditional-anglicans-2
When I read the news about traditional Anglicans who become more and more disillusioned with the liberal direction that the Anglican Communion has chosen in the recent decades and thus decide to become Catholic converts and about the plans of the Roman curia to accommodate them within a special Ordinariate, I have dual feelings: on the one hand, I'm happy that there are so many Christians who genuinely wish to follow the Biblical teaching on morality and ecclesiastic issues and remain unscathed in the face of aggressive secularism; but on the other hand, I cannot approve of the way they have chosen, bearing in mind the history of Orthodox-Anglican dialogue in the past centuries and the perspectives it has opened for both parties.
Hopefully, this article will find an answer in the hearts of both the Orthodox and the members of the Anglican community who are considering their next steps. It wasn't my aim to write another polemical anti-Catholic pamphlet (there are already tons of them in circulation nowadays) – and I will be really sorry if anyone considers this article to be one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
