There is a number of Christian denominations today that preach the so
called "Prosperity Gospel" which has its roots in the
Calvinist/Reformed view on the Predestination. This 'Gospel' says that
you can know you are 100% "Once Saved, Always Saved" by looking on your
wealth. "God wants you to be happy = prosperous", they say. Does it
make sense?
It is interesting to note that most of the
earliest copies of the Sermon on the Mount read, "Blessed are the
poor", period, and do not add [of spirit]. Why are the poor blessed?
Because they imitate our Lord who was born in a cave and was poor
throughout His entire life on Earth.
It is true that "the worst
form of inequality is trying to make unequal things and men equal"
(Aristotle) but we read in many lives of the saints that those of them
who had been rich, typically gave everything they had to the poor and
followed Christ. This ideal of voluntary poverty has been present
throughout the Church history. It is impossible to quote all the
passages of the Gospel where Jesus preaches about the importance of
poverty. That was why St John of Shanghai was walking around the
post-war Paris barefoot. That was why so many rich Christians have fed
the poor; in fact, the most effective charities were founded and
operated by Christians.
Some people say that this poverty
hinders the Orthodox mission and ministry. Well, yes, we lack resources,
we lack educated people, we lack many other things, but most
importantly, we lack the missionary zeal and voluntarily limit our
mission and ministry. The Lord who says, 'Sell your possessions and give
to the poor. Provide purses for yourselves that will not wear out, a
treasure in heaven that will never fail, where no thief comes near and
no moth destroys. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be
also', will show us the way and give us everything we need, for verily,
"there is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or
wife, or children, for the kingdom of God's sake, Who shall not receive
manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life
everlasting."
Others say that the Church should be rich and
wealthy enough to 'impress' the civil authorities so that they could
treat the representatives of the Church on equal terms. However, we have
seen and read so many criticisms from many people because of that. It
is easy to get rid of these criticisms saying that those people use
them as excuses for not coming to the Church, and that it is because of
their sins that they find faults with the Church ministers. But aren't
we called to "cut off the occasion from them that desire occasion?"
The general rule has been this: A preacher mustn't be richer than his
poorest listener. Else they don't trust you.
What do you think about it? Comments in any language are welcome!